Thursday, 31 January 2013

Official Google Panda Update Version 3.7 On June 8th

Google has confirmed the rumors of a Panda refresh happening over the weekend.

Google said this refresh started rolling out on Friday, June 8th and has an impact of less than 1% of search queries in the U.S. and about 1% worldwide.

As I said, the search forums took notice to major changes in the search results, specifically impacting sites that were originally hit by the Panda update. I reached out to Google this morning for a confirmation and they have confirmed the update.

Previously, Google pushed out Panda 3.6 on April 27th, about 6 weeks before this update. Google tends to do Panda and even Penguin refreshes every one to two months.

For more on Panda update, see our Panda update category.

Related Articles
Confirmed: Panda Update 3.6 Happened On April 27th
Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers
Infographic: The Google Panda Update, One Year Later
Google Says Panda 3.4 Is ‘Rolling Out Now’
Dropped In Rankings? Google’s Mistake Over Parked Domains Might Be To Blame
Google Launches Update Targeting Webspam In Search Results
Did Google’s Search Results Get Better Or Worse?

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Google Panda Update Overview:

The SEO community has been a buzz this past week with the latest update from Google, named Penguin. Penguin came down the pipeline last week, right on the tail of the latest Panda update. Since most of the big updates in the past year have been focused on Panda, many site owners are left wondering what the real differences between Panda and Penguin are. Here is a breakdown:

Google Panda Update Overview:
According to Google’s official blog post when Panda launched,

This update is designed to reduce rankings for low-quality sites—sites which are low-value add for users, copy content from other websites or sites that are just not very useful. At the same time, it will provide better rankings for high-quality sites—sites with original content and information such as research, in-depth reports, thoughtful analysis and so on.

Basically, Panda updates are designed to target pages that aren’t necessarily spam but aren’t great quality. This was the first ever penalty that went after “thin content,” and the sites that were hit hardest by the first Panda update were content farms (hence why it was originally called the Farmer update), where users could publish dozens of low-quality, keyword stuffed articles that offered little to no real value for the reader. Many publishers would submit the same article to a bunch of these content farms just to get extra links.

Panda is a site wide penalty, which means that if “enough” (no specific number) pages of your site were flagged for having thin content, your entire site could be penalized. Panda was also intended to stop scrappers (sites that would republish other company’s content) from outranking the original author’s content.

Here is a breakdown of all the Panda updates and their release dates. If your site’s traffic took a major hit around one of these times there is a good chance it was flagged by Panda

1. Panda 1.0 (aka the Farmer Update) on February 24th 2011
2. Panda 2.0 on April 11th 2011. (Panda impacts all English speaking countries)
3. Panda 2.1 on May 9th 2011 or so
4. Panda 2.2 on June 18th 2011 or so.
5. Panda 2.3 on around July 22nd 2011.
6. Panda 2.4 in August 2011(Panda goes international)
7. Panda 2.5 on September 28th 2011
8. Panda 2.5.1 on October 9th 2011
9. Panda 2.5.2 on October 13th 2011
10. Panda 2.5.3 on October 19/20th 2011
11. Panda 3.1 on November 18th 2011
12. Panda 3.2 on about January 15th 2012
13. Panda 3.3 on about February 26th 2012
14. Panda 3.4 on March 23rd 2012
15. Panda 3.5 on April 19th 2012
16. Panda 3.6 on April 27th 2012
17. Panda 3.7 on June 8th 2012
18. Panda 3.8 on June 25th 2012
19. Panda 3.9 on July 24th 2012
20. Panda 3.9.1 on August 20th 2012
21. Panda 3.9.2 on September 18th 2012
22. Panda Update #20 on September 27 2012 (overlapped the EMD Update)
23. Panda #21 on November 5th 2012
24. Panda #22 on December 4th 2012
25. Panda #23 on December 21st 2012
26. Panda #24 on Jan. 22nd 2013

Search Engine Land recently created this great Google Panda update infographic to help walk site owners through the many versions of the Google Panda updates.

Many site owners complained that even after they made changes to their sites in order to be more “Panda friendly,” their sites didn’t automatically recover. Panda updates do not happen at regular intervals, and Google doesn’t re-index every site each time, so some site owners were forced to deal with low traffic for several months until Google got around to re-crawling their website and taking note of any positive changes.

Google Penguin Update Overview:
The Google Penguin Update launched on April 24. According to the Google blog, Penguin is an “important algorithm change targeted at webspam. The change will decrease rankings for sites that we believe are violating Google’s existing quality guidelines.” Google mentions that typical black hat SEO tactics like keyword stuffing (long considered webspam) would get a site in trouble, but less obvious tactics (link incorporating irrelevant outgoing links into a page of content) would also cause Penguin to flag your site. Says Google,

Sites affected by this change might not be easily recognizable as spamming without deep analysis or expertise, but the common thread is that these sites are doing much more than white hat SEO; we believe they are engaging in webspam tactics to manipulate search engine rankings.

Site owners should be sure to check their Google Webmaster accounts for any messages from Google warning about your past spam activity and a potential penalty. Google says that Penguin has impacted about 3.1% of queries (compared to Panda 1.0’s 12%). If you saw major traffic losses between April 24th and April 25th, chances are Penguin is the culprit, even though Panda 3.5 came out around the same time.

Unfortunately, Google has yet to outline exactly what signals Penguin is picking up on, so many site owners that were negatively impacted are in the dark as to where they want wrong with their onsite SEO. Many in the SEO community have speculated that some contributing factors to Penguin might be things like:

1. Aggressive exact-match anchor text
2. Overuse of exact-match domains
3. Low-quality article marketing & blog spam
4. Keyword stuffing in internal/outbound links

It’s important to remember that Panda is an algorithm update, not a manual penalty. A reconsideration request to Google won’t make much a difference–you’ll have to repair your site and wait for a refresh before your site will recover.  As always do not panic if you are seeing a down turn in traffic, in the past when there is a major Google update like this things often rebound.  If you do think you have some sort of SEO penalty as a result of either the Google Panda or Google Penguin updates, please contact your SEO service provider to help or start trouble shooting.

Google has so far rolled out the following Penguin updates:
1. Initial Penguin Update, April 24th 2012
2. Penguin 1.1, May 25th 2012
3. Penguin #3, October 9th 2012

Sunday, 27 January 2013

Google Announces 24th Panda Refresh; Not Related To January 17th

Despite it being just five days from extremely strong signs of a Google update, which Google denied, Google announced yesterday on Twitter that they have pushed out a new Panda refresh.
This would make the 24th revision or refresh to the Panda update since launching in February 2011. This update has a noticeable impact of 1.2% of English queries. The previous once, version 23 on the holidays had an impact of about 1.3%.
Honestly, the forums are not that noisy about this change. The January 17th change, which Google said was nothing, seemed like a much larger Google search update than this 1.2% Panda refresh they announced yesterday.

Thursday, 24 January 2013

SEO Revelations for 2013

The past 2 years have brought in a tremendous amount of change in the world of search, and 2013 will be no different. More Panda releases, Penguin, The EMD update, top heavy ads, and the DMCA update all mark a shift in capabilities for Google. There is more to come.

Today I'm going to take a shot at six predictions for 2013. Some of these predictions may relate to things that you already suspect or believe, but for which tangible proof will emerge. Others may be a bit more controversial. Here goes.

1. We'll get confirmation that steering anchor text in links you get is bad.

Many have suggested that the initial Penguin algorithm included some adjustments for anchor text mix, but I think the surface has barely been scratched on that one, and I believe that Google will do a lot more to discourage artificially created anchor text.

Here is one idea of what they might do with it – instead of penalizing abusive behavior they could simply downgrade the weight of anchor text in ranking. That presumes that they have alternative signals, but I think more and more of those are becoming available (see below).

2. The relevance of a linking page will carry increasing weight.

Many of us already believe that this is a big deal, but it is still really easy to find publishers who obtain strong rankings with lots and lots of links from sites with low relevance. If you believe in links being treated like academic citations, valuing low relevance links doesn't make sense.

One possibility is that this may be driven by a shakeup in the world of guest posting. I don't believe that guest posting will become a bad practice, as there is there is a lot of value in people producing great content and having it carried on high authority sites. Such sites publishing that content does represent a legitimate endorsement of the author's expertise. However, guest posts on sites with low relevance to the topic could start to hurt the site taking the post, and stop helping the publishers that provide the posts.

3. People will finally accept that +1s are not treated by Google like a link.

Matt Cutts has stated it many different times, and in many different ways. Here is what he said in an October 2012 Google+ Hangout:

"In the short term, we're still going to have to study and see how good the signal is, so right now, there is not really a direct effect where if you have a lot of +1s, you'll rank higher."
However, we will see published proof that Google+ shares and +1s influence discovery (i.e., if you create new page, don't link to it, but then +1 it, the page will be crawled and indexed). I also think we will see specific vertical ways that +1s influence ranking, but it just won't be "like a link".

So how else are social signals going to be used in the near term? Read on!

4. Rel=author will become a ranking signal

In the same Google+ Hangout, Cutts has made several references to authorship data as a signal. Here is one of the more recent comments he made:

"...over time, as we start to learn more about who the high quality authors are, you could imagine that starting to affect rankings."
This will be the big new ranking signal for 2013. Not only that, I bet that this will go well beyond the rel=author tag. We have already seen evidence that Google is looking for more signals to flag authorship. Consider this erroneous authorship tagging example:



The article is tagged as being written by me, yet it was written by Stephan Spencer, and even says so in the snippet: "About The Author: Stephan Spencer ...". The page is properly tagged with Stephan's rel=author tag as well, pointing to his Google+ profile. Yet Google picked up my name from the bio reference to The Art of SEO.

This may in fact have something to do with my Google+ profile, and could represent tangible evidence of Google+ as an SEO signal. I believe there are lots of other ways that Google+ activity and authorship will end up interacting.

5. Google+ will begin to show some of its true influence in search results

Not just an indication that someone I know +1'ed or shared an article, but in other ways. Consider the role of Google+ in validating what other signals are saying. Imagine two sites with strong link profiles, but differing social interaction:



For this discussion, assume that all the links referenced have exactly equal value, the link signals would suggest that Site A is the better site. However, Site A has no social activity related to it.

Even if they have no active Google+ promotional effort, there should be some pulse there for a site with such a strong link profile. It just doesn't look right. It certainly seems to me, at least, that Site B is a better site which is far more likely to have earned its links naturally.

6. The industry will start to talk about the role of landing page optimization in SEO

We already have proof that this impacts search as shown in detail in this post by AJ Kohn. Consider the case of a search on link building that brings up this Search Engine Watch article:



If you stay on the article for a period of time (believed to be 2 minutes) and then to back to the SERPs, the results are altered:



The altered result displays a list of other articles I've written. This shows us two things:

Google is measuring time on site via time delays in interaction with the search results.
Google considers a longer time on site to be an indication of interest in the site by the user.
While this shows Google modifying the presentation of the results, not altering the order, there are many in the industry, including myself, that believe that Google tracks users who bounce back to the SERPs and click on a different result as a potential negative ranking signal. This would be especially true if the bounce back from the initial click happens quickly.

These are strong indicators that the user experience on your site is an SEO factor. Put simply: Want better rankings? One element of doing this is improving the user experience on your site!

Wrap Up

These are a few of the things I expect to see in 2013. One thing is quite certain – many changes will take place.

Expect another big update from Google in the first quarter of the year, and ongoing activity throughout the entire year. As always, learn to focus on serving the needs of your audience as your first priority, as this is one of your most important SEO tactics.

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

5 Common SEO Mistakes with Web Page Titles

1. Not Having a Title
There is a tremendous number of websites that don’t have a title tag or that use a default title like "Untitled Document". Just try a search in Google for "untitled document" and you won’t believe the millions of results that matches your search.



Because search engines use your <title> tag to display in their search results, not having one — or having one that isn’t meaningful — makes it hard to find and index your pages.

Page titles give a web page some context. It tells a web robot like Google’s search spider what the web page is about.

2. Page Titles That Are Too Short or Too Long
Even though this is not a massive issue, short page titles will limit the potential of a page to rank for several keywords. Google, for example, can display up to 70 characters in their search engine results page (SERP) — why not take advantage of that?

But don’t overdo it. Keep in mind that the more keywords there are in the title, the more diluted they become. Having too many keywords in the page title, although visible by Google, can lead to the common issue of keyword cannibalization (which we will talk about next).

Terms that appear first in the title are the ones that will be given more importance. For example, if a web page talks about how to repair a broken hard drive on a Dell XPS laptop and the main keywords are "repair", "Dell", and "XPS", a title like:

<title>DIY: How to Repair a Broken Hard Drive on a Dell XPS Laptop</title>
Can be revised to:

<title>Repair a Dell XPS Laptop's Broken Hard Drive<title>
Notice how the key terms are closer to the beginning in the second example, and that it is shorter than the first example. Not only is it better for search engine ranking, but it’s also easier to read and comprehend.

Devise great titles that give your web pages meanings, and remember that web users want information quickly — don’t make them have to think about what your page titles are by writing informative page titles that are neither too short and lacking information or too long and hard to read.

3. Keyword Cannibalization
This is a situation when pages titles are stuffed with too many keywords. Keyword-stuffing is an unscrupulous tactic that a few SEO consultants use to improve their clients’ search engine rankings. Though I am an SEO consultant myself, I don’t recommend blatantly loading your pages with keywords because not only does it affect your search engine ranking’s effectiveness, but is also the reason that we sometimes see non-relevant web pages ranking highly for a specific keyword.

Because your web pages are (or should be) distinct and should have unique content, the same should be the case with page titles. Repeating the same keywords in various pages regardless of whether or not they are relevant to that particular page is not going to help, mainly for two reasons:

Irrelevant web pages may be picked up by the search engines, but will have high bounce rates as it doesn’t convert effectively due to the fact that the page isn’t what the searcher is looking for
It violates Google’s mantra of "Don’t be evil"
4. Using the Company/Site Name in All Web Pages
As previously said, Google displays up to 70 characters of a given page title in their SERPs. It does see longer ones, though, and despite what many SEO professionals preach, it isn’t a huge problem to have page titles that are greater than 70 characters in a page title.

Nevertheless, you need to think of what should and shouldn’t appear in the title. Many website owners tend to include their business name in the title, some of which can be very lengthy. What is even worse is that they want their name to appear first in every single web page.

Including your company name (unless it’s a search term that will likely be used), is unnecessary, and is consistent with some of the mistakes I’ve discussed earlier.

For example, study this title:

<title>ACME Exporting/Importing Company, LLC: Export Surfboards to Hawaii<title>
With the page title including the company’s name, it is using 37 more characters (with spaces)!

Search engine ranking might be better if it was simply:

<title>Export Surfboards to Hawaii</title>
It would make sense displaying your company name in the homepage, contact page, and about page but avoid them in content pages.

5. Duplicate Web Page Titles
Another common mistake is having duplicate page titles. This makes it difficult to determine which page is which when they are all displayed in search engine results pages.

As previously said, all of your web pages should be unique — so by logic, all of your web page titles should also be unparalleled.

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Google Tag Manager

Google Tag Manager

If you have used different Google products like, Google Analytics, Google Adwords, Remarking, Conversion tracking then you must be knowing that, each time you want to experiment something or track something, you need to add a separate code on your website, and if you are working in a big organization then your trouble gets doubled, as you need to run around your project manager & then webmaster who manages the coding & server of your website & request them to add new code & all that. But now, thankfully, it will not be needed with Google Tag Manager.Yes, One code snippet & you can track whatever you want to track with Google services without adding any additional code to your website. That’s what Google Tag Manager is all about. In a recent announcement, Google shared that,Google Tag Manager is a free tool that consolidates your website tags with a single snippet of code and lets you manage everything from a web interface. You can add and update your own tags, with just a few clicks, whenever you want, without bugging the IT folks or rewriting site code. It gives marketers greater flexibility, and lets webmasters focus on other important tasks

http://www.facebook.com/DlkTechnologies

http://www.facebook.com/DlkTechnologies